Home | Back

Field school board majority explains action on academy

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

In response to the March 9 article in the Record-Courier, titled "Falcon Academy is losing its wings," the majority of the Field Board of Education responds as follows:

We sincerely understand and appreciate the disappointment felt by those interested in the Falcon Academy. It was only after months of endless research, work sessions, meetings, countless calls to the Ohio Department of Education and discussions, that the majority of the board came to the difficult conclusion that because of ongoing inconsistencies, unanswered question, failure to provide documents requested and lack of specifics, too many red flags were waving -- threatening the academy's potential success. The following is a rather brief explanation of our position.

The proposed Falcon Academy is separate from Field Local Schools. Field administration, at the expense of the Field Local Schools, will oversee its operation.

The only funds the academy has received to date are start-up funds received in August 2009, in the amount of $50,000. Unfortunately, due to poor planning and attention to detail, the check remained in the school safe until February and when those responsible attempted to cash the check -- it had expired. Consequently, because of a failure to follow proper procedures, Field Local Schools has borne the cost of all start-up expenses from July 2009 to present. Had proper procedures and sound fiscal management been followed, the grant check would have been immediately deposited in a separate account as is required, and only those funds used, which was of course, the State's intent in allotting the $50,000 for start-up expenses.

The grant balance of $450,000 was to be provided to the academy in two increments of $225,000 each year for two years. After that time the academy must reapply for more grants. Further, these grants cannot be used for salaries but are restricted funds for equipment, supplies, etc. for the Falcon Academy.

The board met with their concerns on the Falcon Academy last summer and expressed items to be placed in the contract to protect Field Local Schools and our teachers. We were told "no problem," that those items would be in the contract. None of those items were in the contract received by the board last week.

According to the vague contract submitted to the board just days before the board meeting, which incidentally did not allow sufficient time for the board to consult an attorney for a legal opinion, a 3 percent return would be allotted to the Field Local Schools. This is an insignificant amount considering if 65 students attend the academy for which Field currently receives approximately $5,700 per student, Field Local Schools would realize an approximate $400,000 per year loss in revenue. The administration's response to this concern was that the difference would be made up from students coming to Field through open enrollment. Open enrollment occurs primarily in kindergarten and first grade -- the vacancies will be in third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms. This may allow those students left to be clustered into crowded third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms to free classroom space for another kindergarten or first grade classroom of open enrollment. And if there were still openings at the academy, open-enrolled students new to the district in grades 3-5 could opt for the academy rather than the existing elementary. Which means Field Local may never occupy those empty seats and restore their income.

The majority of the board questioned why the focus of the academy was on the elementary grades instead of middle and high school where the greatest need exists and from where we lose the majority of students to other schools. The response was that parents still make the decisions for their children at the elementary level, and therefore an increased chance for higher enrollment may be realized. This was a curious response in that the community schools realizing success are for middle and high school students and located in urban and declining areas.

Recently, the proposed staff of the Falcon Academy took a two-day tour of a performing arts school in Akron and Toledo -- both for middle and high school students and located in urban and declining areas, which did not allow for a fair comparison to an elementary school in a rural setting. In addition, admission to the Akron school is selective and accepted only through auditions. It was suggested the tour be postponed until after the March 8 meeting so further expense could be avoided and hopes would not be fostered until a final decision was made concerning the future of the academy. Unfortunately the administration chose not to follow the suggestion. Further, it is important to keep in mind that according to the Ohio Department of Education, the approximate life span of a community school in a rural area, such as ours, is two years. If a school fails, all equipment, supplies, etc. purchased through the grant, must be returned to the State or sold with the funds reverting to the State.

The board majority has been concerned about the lack of consistency in communication with parents, student and community which has resulted in considerable confusion. Parents were misled to believe the Falcon Academy was a "sure thing." Devastation was unfortunately felt when the "no" votes were cast. Originally parents were told it was for the gifted and advanced and would offer a rigorous curriculum. But, in actuality, the curriculum will be identical to the currently offered curriculum in our elementary classes. However, the board has not as yet received specifics on the curriculum, including the performing arts component that will be offered.

Also, parents were told all students, including children with special needs, would be accepted. However, at the time a board member requested specifics for the special education component, there were no plans to house a special education teacher, which is required by law. As of March 8, to our knowledge, this accommodation had still not been solidified.

The administration has publicly stated that 65 Field students are interested in attending the Falcon Academy. The board cannot deny or confirm the accuracy of this number. Despite repeated requests over a two-month time frame, for a list of potential attendees, the administration has failed to honor said request. In a meeting specifically scheduled for students from other school districts who might have an interest in attending the academy through open enrollment, not a single parent or student attended. Field administration and board members attended and waited -- to no avail. Consequently it was curious to read in the local newspaper that within a two-week period, 80 outside students had enrolled even though no meetings were held during that time period to accommodate open enrollment students and their families. Needless to say, the figures announced by the superintendent, Dr. Brobeck, in the Record-Courier, cannot be substantiated by the board.

Because of confidentiality issues, all concerns of the majority of the board cannot be aired in a public forum. However, we hope that we have provided some insight into a few of the issues (exclusive of several) that resulted in our taking the position we did.

Please trust that we worked tirelessly to do our homework before reaching a decision. We took the oath to offer the best possible education for all 2,400 Field students and it is that commitment that resulted in our decision.

Linda Cooper

President

Donna Karg

Allyson Westover

Members

Field Board of Education




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 7 Total Comments
7.
    Posted by cooleronline March 16, 2010
Ungowa Coop! Are you off your MEDS again?

6.
    Posted by coop March 15, 2010
Ungowa booknook! Hey FLTA , do you know what Ungowa is? Its those mounds of warm, steaming, land mines you find in a cow pasture. But you can also find it in the 3 ladies response. You see, probably 90% of their objections (ie head count, expired check,2 year deal. blah blah.) , are still going to be there tonight and its UNGOWA! Why? Because if the 3 ladies truly believed in their response, the Creative Arts initiative would still not pass. However, zero in on the paragraph 6 "make changes in the contract to PROTECT OUR TEACHERS" and you understand that the FLTA wants to get their tentacles into the Field Academy by hook or crook. Like to know what was changed. To the plus side, Field community members and taxpayers are seeing first hand the FLTA and how they "CARE FOR THE KIDS" Ungowa!

5.
    Posted by booknook2 March 15, 2010
Very informative response. There is no excuse for the check sitting around that long. I'm sure everyone agrees on that sloppiness. Unlike Congress that passes stuff without reading it, this group read the contract and had legitimate concerns that were missing from it. I think it was right to stop, and make sure what was promised gets written into it.

4.
    Posted by coop March 14, 2010
Did not mean to impugn all the hardworking housewives in our district, but the action by this Board limits their choices for their children And their children will not have the opportunity of a FREE CREATIVE ARTS program. Of course their were start-up glitches and we do not know were it may be in 2 years. But every new program has that and we had a real neat way of freeing up our budget deficit for 2 years without a new tax levy. But its no joke. The FLTA union picked orange t shirts in their protest but they might as well have picked jail orange, because now the inmates are running the prison.

3.
    Posted by coop March 14, 2010
Bull hockey.I haven't seen so much manure since my neighbor spread his fields a few weeks ago, and now this board and the FLTA is spreading their manure on our Field school system , and it stinks . Paragraph 6 says it all. " make changes in the contract TO PROTECT OUR TEACHERS." What a load of crap. You see folks, the FLTA and the stacked Field Board, does not want the Field academy to be run by the administrators. I even doubt that these 3 housewives wrote the above drivel. Housewives, READ your oath again. You didn't swear fealty to the FLTA but you did swear an oath to be good stewards of tax dollars. Since the FLTA did not support the free stimulus money "RACE to the Top" and the FLTA didn't support the free grant money for the Field academy, I come to the conclusion that the FLTA union WILL SUPPORT coming at Field taxpayers for more tax levies.

2.
    Posted by Love it or Leave it March 14, 2010
I was very impressed with your data. You did an excellent job on your research. It is the Administration who has failed miserably to inform the public. Communication is not a strength for them. It is so pathetic that they left that check sit in that safe all that time. They goofed it up themselves. Everyone please read the truth. It is in this letter. I am proud to say that we did choose the right people for this job. I don't think our school district needs to pay for anyone at this school. Now that is discrimination when you left out the special ed. accomodations to this school. Federal Govt. wouldn't like that at all without special ed teacher and paropros.You might need more than that. Hey PT,OT and adapted PE Egads. We need a whole wing. We might need to hire that many people. Those IEPS better be followed to the T. Where is our leadership in the school?
Thank you for your dedication and leadership professionals on the board. You better keep an eye on all of them.

1.
    Posted by mmec March 14, 2010
Thank you for your dedication and hard work.

The questions and concerns voiced in your letter are valid and certainly not a case of "micro-managing". The Falcon Academy proponents had over 6 months and $50,000 dollars to prepare a formal report on the feasibility of a conversion school. They couldn't even cash a check - how do we expect them to open a school that will generate "revenue" for the district.

Home | Back