Quantcast
Home | Back

Firm to give estimate on courthouse: Commissioners eyeing new building in Kent

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

By Mike Sever

Record-Courier staff writer

A Cleveland architecture firm has been hired to estimate the cost of a new free-standing courthouse facility in Kent, a decision apparently made without consulting the judges who will use it.

County commissioners took the action by 2-1 vote last week, hiring Richard L. Bowen & Associates at a cost of $13,800 to conduct a planning, engineering and architectural study.

The panel held no interviews with the three firms that submitted proposals. Nor did commissioners discuss the proposals with Municipal Court Judge Barbara Oswick and Clerk of Courts Linda Fankhauser, who are on the committee planning the new courthouse.

The Bowen firm was chosen over Brandstetter Carroll Zofcin Inc. of Cleveland, which priced the study at $14,000; and Hasenstab Architects, Inc./David L. Sommers, which set a fee of $11,865.

Bowen’s proposal was identical, except for the fee, to the scope of services in the “qualifications to provide architectural services” submitted by Brandstetter in April.

Commissioners Chuck Keiper and Chris Smeiles voted to hire Bowen while Commissioner Maureen Frederick voted no.

Keiper moved to hire Bowen, because the county had not done any work with the firm recently.

“I thought the bottom line was, it should be done in consultation with the judges,” Frederick said. “I think they should have been in the loop and consulted before the decision was made. I thought perhaps we could have considered some others. Why start out without consulting the judges?”

Municipal Court Judge Barbara Oswick said the vote caught her by surprise. 

“I was not contacted and was unaware it was even being considered at this point,” she said. “I was unaware of it until I called JoAnn Townend (director of Internal Services) to add two names of architects who designed local courthouses to the list of potential architects.”

Oswick was backing Brandstetter to do the study. The firm designed the new Stow Municipal Courthouse along with a number of other court facilities in Ohio, and she was impressed with their work.

Brandstetter submitted a list of 43 court and public administration buildings its has been involved with, including 18 in Ohio. Commissioners had Internal Services Director JoAnn Townend solicit two more proposals.

Both Bowen and Hasenstab/Sommers have been architects on county projects. Hasenstab/Sommers designed the renovation of the county courthouse in Ravenna and did a master planning study for the county in 2004. David Sommers updated that study in 2008.

Employees of the firms also have been campaign contributors to Keiper and Smeiles.

County and Kent government leaders have been talking about a joint courthouse and city safety services building for more than two years without identifying a site or time frame for construction. Officials have been saying the joint project would save money for both users.

Oswick asked how the county knew it would save money with a joint project if it did not know how much a free-standing courthouse could cost.

Judges started collecting money for a new courthouse a couple years ago by imposing a special court fee. That fund now has about $2 million in it.

The court currently is housed in a former 1930s-era post office on South Water Street in downtown Kent.

E-mail: 

msever@recordpub.com

Phone: 330 298-1125

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 6 Total Comments
6.
    Posted by moroniohio1 July 11, 2009
Um, the courthouse IS in the county seat. This is a municipal court (much smaller) and it is common to have them outside the county seat, particularly when there is a large amount of people outside the county seat. Stow is building a new courthouse and has been able to get the municipal court moved out of Cuyahoga Falls. Even though the property is tax exempt, the employees still have to pay income tax, so it's in Kent's benefit to keep it.

Since most of the municipal court cases tend to involve KSU students, or so it seems, it makes sense to have one in Kent.

5.
    Posted by DoWhatsRight July 10, 2009
Why do we have to have a Court House in Kent anyway? What is nex,t one in Streetsboro, them Hiram and then Garrettsville and Windham? The court house should be in the county seat. We do not need more buildings to maintain, more personal to clean, and more parking spaces for the employees. This property could be used for some business and we would get tax from it.

The County has all that land and buildings on Infirmary Road, the old hospital, the building adjacent to the old Vale edge, several houses on Meridian St., the County Garage at Cotton Corners, the current Kent Court building, and the Sheriff if Blackhorse. How many buildings do we really need? How much money could be saved by combining them into one building or a complex located on one property?

4.
    Posted by I'M NOT A BAD GUY July 10, 2009
Get Real.

Portage County is Broke.

Lower my poperty taxes and be happy with the facilites you have.

Did anyone tell you the economy is dying in Ohio and Portage County.

We are going to be the next Mahoning County.

M

3.
    Posted by mr. citizen July 10, 2009
Business as usual. Keip and Chrissy scratchin some backs.

2.
    Posted by Helspont July 10, 2009
"Judges started collecting money for a new courthouse a couple years ago by imposing a special court fee. That fund now has about $2 million in it."
How is this legal?What law is this?How do judges have the right to set fees for something that I consider to be personal gain for them?Especially when they are going to be in the loop on how the building turns out.

1.
    Posted by Zippster July 10, 2009
After his fracas with sending his kid to nursing school on public funds earmarked for the poor, I wouldn't trust anything Smeiles voted YES on...

Home | Back