Quantcast
Home | Back

Obama: No stimulus may mean dire future ... President-elect gives near apocalyptic warning for U.S. economy

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

By Jennifer Loven

Associated Press

FAIRFAX, Va. -- President-elect Barack Obama urged dubious lawmakers Thursday to work with him "day and night, on weekends if necessary" to approve the largest taxpayer-funded stimulus ever, warning in almost apocalyptic terms that a dire economic future was certain without it.

Obama's speech, an extraordinary move for a president-in-waiting that reflected the grim urgency of the times and perhaps the crack in congressional support, came amid a flurry of new activity in the negotiations on Capitol Hill over the massive proposal's details. Not long after Obama spoke, some senators from his own party publicly criticized his plan to include tax cuts.

Emerging from a private meeting of the Senate Finance Committee, several Democrats expressed deep skepticism that the kind of business and individual tax cuts Obama has been discussing would do much to create jobs or increase consumer spending.

Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota said a proposed $3,000 tax credit for companies that hire or retrain workers wouldn't spur job creation if those companies' products still weren't selling. Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said a tax cut giving workers only about $10 to $20 more per week wouldn't change purchase patterns.

Meanwhile, Obama's economic advisers were on Capitol Hill briefing Democratic lawmakers on details of the president-elect's plan. And the Senate Democratic caucus planned a late afternoon meeting, followed by a news conference by Majority Leader Harry Reid and other caucus leaders.

Making a case for action, Obama warned in his speech that "a bad situation could become dramatically worse" if Washington doesn't go far enough. He talked of the possibility of double-digit unemployment and $1 trillion in lost economic activity, stark predictions that recalled the days of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

But, he said, "We are still the nation that has overcome great fears and improbable odds. If we act with the urgency and seriousness that this moment requires, I know that we can do it again."

Since his November election, Obama has deferred to President George W. Bush on foreign policy matters such as the Middle East. But, with the economic situation worsening, Obama has waded in deeply on that front, an issue certain to define and dominate his early presidency.

It was the fourth day in a row that he had made a pitch for a huge infusion of taxpayer dollars to revive the sinking economy he will inherit from Bush.

Obama's events have increasingly taken on the trappings and air of the presidency. Thursday's speech -- coming 12 days before he takes over at the White House -- was a particularly showy move. Presidents-elect typically stick to naming administration appointments and otherwise staying in the background during the transition period between Election Day and Inauguration Day, but Obama has clearly made the calculation that a nation anxious about its economic outlook needs to hear from him differently and more frequently.

The president-elect cast blame on "an era of profound irresponsibility that stretched from corporate boardrooms to the halls of power in Washington."

Obama shed no new light on the details of his plan that could cost as much as $775 billion over two years. And, he said little about the unprecedented red ink and rising debt confronting the government, even after spending days reassuring the public and Congress that he is committed to tackling long-term deficits once the economy rebounds.

But he laid out goals of doubling the production of alternative energy over three years, making 75 percent of federal buildings and two million homes more energy efficient, computerizing all medical records in five years, expanding broadband networks and updating schools and universities.

"It's a plan that represents not just new policy but a whole new approach to meeting our most urgent challenges," he said at George Mason University in suburban Washington.

Obama's economic team is considering a package, half of which would be devoted to spending ranging from infrastructure to assistance to states. About 40 percent -- roughly $300 billion -- would be tax cuts for individuals and businesses, and about 10 percent would be spent on assistance to unemployed workers.

Governors of six states and mayors of 14 cities -- a bipartisan audience that came from as far away as Minnesota and Utah to be among the few hundred in attendance -- listened to the speech that lasted less than a half hour. The group remained silent until light applause at the end.

Elsewhere, there was more grim economic news.

A government report showed that the number of people drawing jobless benefits rose last week to the highest level since 1982, demonstrating the troubles the unemployed are having in finding new jobs.

And broader unemployment figures due out Friday are expected to show that the U.S. lost a net total of 500,000 jobs in December. That would bring 2008's total job losses to 2.4 million, the first annual job loss since 2001 and the highest since 1945, though the number of jobs has more than tripled since then.

Speaking a day after the release of a stunning new deficit estimate -- that the federal red ink will reach an unprecedented $1.2 trillion this year, nearly three times last year's record -- Obama acknowledged some sympathy with those who "might be skeptical" of the stimulus. Vast sums already have been spent or committed by Washington in an attempt -- largely unsuccessful so far -- to get credit, the lifeblood of the American economy, flowing freely once again.

Such statements are meant to appeal to both parties' budget hawks, whom Obama wants to win over so that approval of a package draws wide, bipartisan support in the Democratic-led Congress.

------

Associated Press writers Stephen Ohlemacher and Andrew Taylor contributed to this story from Washington.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 14 Total Comments
14.
    Posted by AVERAGEJOE6 January 10, 2009
you betcha......

13.
    Posted by whydoicare January 10, 2009
Thank God for folks like AVERAGEJOE6

12.
    Posted by AVERAGEJOE6 January 9, 2009
Concerned - They won't take the time to read the 10 planks of the communist maifesto to see how the dems have been grooming us for this decades.

11.
    Posted by AVERAGEJOE6 January 9, 2009
Fair Tax, You are on the money but you are barking up the wrong tree by explaining the truth with these libs. They get all of their info from conspiracy theorist sites and worship men like Micheal Moore. The more controvesial the better. LOL. also they don't understand history or how the success or failure of a president is determined by their predessesor. Even though Clinton was a huge failure. You will never hear them admit that he built his economy based on Beanie Babies, trading cards and junk websites. Didn't protect the country from terrorists and sold all of the good jobs to Asia and Mexico. LOL what a joke.

10.
    Posted by Come on November January 9, 2009
You No Brained Liberals crack me up. This Country is headed toward Socialism and you have no clue what this means for our Country. Who are you going to blame when Bush is gone? When the Marxist Obama gets done running this country it will be too late for all of us. Do a little research and you will see how we got to where we are today. Its called the Democratic Congress.

Liberals = Communism ,Socialism and Marxist.

9.
    Posted by Fair Tax January 9, 2009
Much of the great economy Clinton left us with resulted from fraud (See TYCO) and unlimited credit. And as I recall, we went into a recession a very short time after Bush entered office. Recessions do not start overnight, usually after six months after the start of recession is it visible. So really the first recession was Clinton's fault during the Bush Presidency. Just a little history lesson.

8.
    Posted by PeaceNik January 9, 2009
Bush voted worst President in US History.
Bush got us into an illegal war, spreading lies of mass deception.
Bush has made the US the most hated Country in the World.
I could go on, but i don't want to be accused of having PBDS as AMT21 might accuse me of. And for the rest of you Bush fanatics, is a verse in a song you all know well "If I only had a BRAIN" if any of you out there that can tell me ONE good thing that Bush did for you, please, it would be nice know.

7.
    Posted by AMT January 9, 2009
Warning: Bush Derangement Syndrome spotted.

You can take a pill for that now.

Ask your doctor if that pill is right for you.

6.
    Posted by bslease1 January 9, 2009
listen up all of you conservative right winged idiots, bush put this country in all of its problems with all of his cronies he gave money to. example: big oil, blackwater, saudi arabia, china, the corporate greed mongers, etc.... clinton left this country with a HUGE surplus in the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$dept. obama is not to blame for any of this MESS .

5.
    Posted by whydoicare January 9, 2009
You people are bent for sure.

Bush did the same thing and you thought it was a great idea.

How about this for an idea: end the pointless war in Iraq, bring our troops home and once we stop borrowing 10 billion a month from the Chineese, give the US tax payers a tax break since we won't need that money any more.

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back